Re: DCCP minutes

["Phelan, Tom" <tphelan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, I do plan on updating the natencap draft -- any day now...
 
Tom P.

________________________________

From: dccp-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of Pasi Sarolahti
Sent: Mon 11/16/2009 4:47 PM
To: Andrew Lentvorski
Cc: DCCP working group
Subject: Re:  DCCP minutes



On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Andrew Lentvorski wrote:

>> re udp encapsulation
>> - Magnus Westerlund: issue will be discussed in tsvarea on Friday. 
>> Magnus is split on the idea, he sees the benefit, but also the 
>> concern
>> - Colin Perkins: we have an implementation of the nat encapsulation
>> - Murari Sridharan: lots of people are trying to implement, but the 
>> lack of firewall traversal is stopping people. some udp encap would 
>> be good.
>> - Markku Kojo: don't need a spec, just fill out the iana form
>> - Magnus: yes, but a spec is importent.
>
> What was the final result about UDP encapsulation and NAT traversal?

You forgot to quote one line from this part:

> - Colin: why don't we just publish Tom Phelan's draft as 
> experimental? Ask Tom to resubmit it (or I'll do it...)

I believe Tom plans to update the UDP encapsulation draft, and when 
done, we will then see where to go from there.

- Pasi