Re: WG status for draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-dccp-qs

["Ingemar Johansson S" <ingemar.s.johansson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I too believe that quickstart may be useful for VoIP. The application is
then more likely to be able to resume transmission quickly after e.g
call onhold. 
I don't however expect silence periods to be a big problem as most
speech codecs transmit comfort noise frames 2 times per second or even
more often during silence.

Regards
Ingemar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dccp-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:dccp-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Roksana Boreli
> Sent: den 13 maj 2008 11:19
> To: Phelan, Tom
> Cc: dccp@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  WG status for draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-dccp-qs
> 
> Positive. Considering the use with VoIP we need methods 
> which, while being fair to TCP, also allow the application to 
> send data when it needs to.  
> 
> 
> 
> Kind regards, Roksana
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dccp-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:dccp-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Phelan, Tom
> Sent: Wednesday, 7 May 2008 11:46 PM
> To: dccp@xxxxxxxx
> Subject:  WG status for draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-dccp-qs
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> In Philly, we decided to poll the mailing list for support in 
> making draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-dccp-qs a working group draft 
> (Quick Start for DCCP).  So this is the poll :-).
> 
> Please actively respond with positive, negative or don't care opinions
> -- I can't hear you hum around the world :-).
> 
> Tom P.
> 
>