Re: advice needed for gentoo bug involving lvm2/udev

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 18:41, William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> we have the following bug posted in gentoo's bugzilla:
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365227.
>
> The reporter is telling me that we should use --action=change instead of
> --action=add in the cold boot sequence when dev is devtmpfs. However,
> this doesn't seem to be the correct fix based on earlier discussions on
> this list.
>
> Does anyone else have any suggestions for fixing this? My thought is
> that the rules for lvm2 should be fixed. What does everyone else think?

--action=add is still the recommended and default way of doing coldplug.

It should only be done once after udevd is started though, and never
again. All later triggers should be change only.

Devtmpfs does not really matter here, it's the replay of the missed
events, which should be add and not change.

Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux DVB]     [Video Technology]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Devices]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Add to Google Powered by Linux