Re: future of development for the desktop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






----- Original Message -----
> From: Gour <gour@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: 
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 7:40 PM
> Subject: Re: future of development for the desktop
> 
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 09:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
> Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>  Nowadays there is QML ( 
>>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QML ) and in my opinion, though I do not 
>>  know Javascript, it can be compared to Perl (e.g. closures are
>>  present), so today I'd probably choose Qt + QML.
> 
> "QML is mainly used for mobile applications where touch input, fluid
> animations (60 FPS) and user experience are crucial."
> 
> 
> Sincerely,
> Gour
> 

I didn't read the whole QML documentation, but I don't think that QML can not be used without animations and that it cannot be used with traditional input from mouse and keyboard.

I.e. my understanding of QML is that it's JavaScript-like language Qt binding with additional capabilities like GUI creation from description and the features you've mentioned.

...

Still, since we are discussing bare-naked gtk+, I am re-asking my question: in what aspects gtk+ is better than Qt ? Especially, since we already know it (used to be ? still is ?) slower tan Qt.

Regards,
  Sergei.

_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list



[Index of Archives]     [Touch Screen Library]     [GIMP Users]     [Gnome]     [KDE]     [Yosemite News]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux