[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: Lots of fixes against gpm-2-dev



* Nico Schottelius <nico-gpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hey Enrico,
> 
> Enrico Weigelt [Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 06:19:01AM +0200]:
> > here're a lot of fixes against the latest gpm-2-dev branch
> > (because it didnt want to compile ;-o):
> > 
> > git://git.metux.de/gpm.git -> METUX.gpm-2-dev-cleanup
> 
> Looks good besides 9b76c2f2674d290508791d56629aaf8b63aac051
> (defining _GNU_SOURCE). I'll merge it anyway, but keep in mind

hmm, anyone have better idea ? 

The problem is: glibc only defines struct ucred w/ _GNU_SOURCE set.
No other (probably more portable) symbol.

I really wonder why the inventors of this stuff didn't simply
put it in its own header file. Probably too trivial for being 
considered ;-o


cu
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
 	http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
	http://patches.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
gpm mailing list
gpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/gpm

[Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux