[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Using GNUGK for LRQ responses only



In your last mail you said Debian gave you version 2.3.0. The CatchAll
policy only exists in 2.3.1+.

Regards,
Jan

Maulik Shah wrote:
> Sorry to keep the questions coming - I did add catchall to the RoutingLRQ
> Config:
> [RoutingPolicy]
> default=explicit,internal,parent,neighbor
> 
> [RoutingPolicy::OnLRQ]
> ;0048=internal
> default=internal,catchall
> 
> [Routing::CatchAll]
> CatchAllIP=xx.xx.xx.54
> 
> 
> Logs:
> 2012/03/30 12:53:26.328 1             RasSrv.cxx(368)   RAS     LRQ
> Received from 10.35.59.170:1719
> 2012/03/30 12:53:26.328 2            Toolkit.cxx(560)
> RewriteToE164: 123@xxxxxxxx to 123
> 2012/03/30 12:53:26.328 3               gkauth.h(933)   GKAUTH  default LRQ
> check ok
> 2012/03/30 12:53:26.328 5              Routing.h(177)   ROUTING Checking
> policy Internal for the request LRQ 28943
> 2012/03/30 12:53:26.328 2             RasSrv.cxx(408)
> LRJ|10.35.59.170|123@xxxxxxxx:h323_ID|10.35.59.170|requestDenied;
> 2012/03/30 12:53:26.328 3             RasSrv.cxx(250)   RAS     Send to
> 10.35.59.170:1719
> locationReject {
>     requestSeqNum = 28943
>     rejectReason = requestDenied <<null>>
>   }
> 2012/03/30 12:53:26.328 5             RasSrv.cxx(264)   RAS     Sent
> Successful
> 
> It does not seem to use teh catchall policy for routing it appears.
> 
> Thanks
> Maulik
> 
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Maulik Shah <maushah@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I prefer catch all - will give that a shot.
> >
> > I did try adding this as a permanent EP but in the LCF GnuGk sends back
> > the Call Signal Port as 0 or 1721, even though I added it as 1720
> >
> > 2012/03/30 09:58:55.647 1             RasTbl.cxx(282)   New
> > EP|x.x.x.54:1720|e.bjn.vc:h323_ID|gateway|8358_endp
> > 2012/03/30 09:58:55.647 2             RasTbl.cxx(1944)  Add permanent
> > endpoint x.x.x.54:1720
> >
> > Routing:
> > 2012/03/30 09:59:55.098 3               gkauth.h(933)   GKAUTH  default
> > LRQ check ok
> > 2012/03/30 09:59:55.098 5              Routing.h(177)   ROUTING Checking
> > policy Internal for the request LRQ 28936
> > 2012/03/30 09:59:55.098 2             RasTbl.cxx(1336)  RASTBL  Gateway
> > 8358_endp matched as a default gateway
> > 2012/03/30 09:59:55.098 4             RasTbl.cxx(1724)  RASTBL  Prefix
> > match for gateways:
> > 199.48.152.54:1720
> > 2012/03/30 09:59:55.098 5              Routing.h(183)   ROUTING Policy
> > Internal applied to the request LRQ 28936
> > 2012/03/30 09:59:55.098 2             RasSrv.cxx(408)
> > LCF|10.35.59.170|8358_endp|123@xxxxxxxx:h323_ID|10.35.59.170;
> > 2012/03/30 09:59:55.098 3             RasSrv.cxx(250)   RAS     Send to
> > 10.35.59.170:1719
> > locationConfirm {
> >     requestSeqNum = 28936
> >     callSignalAddress = ipAddress {
> >       ip =  4 octets {
> >         xx xx xx 36                                        .0.6
> >       }
> >       port = 1721
> >     }
> >     rasAddress = ipAddress {
> >       ip =  4 octets {
> >         xx xx xx 36                                        .0.6
> >       }
> >       port = 1719
> >     }
> >   }
> >
> > BTW the apt-get install uses GNUGK 2.3.0, not 2.3.6
> >
> > Any thoughts on this?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Maulik
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Jan Willamowius <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> no, I meant when you use the 'catchall' policy, GnuGk will send a LCF
> >> for all LRQs, even if there is no endpoint that exactly matches the
> >> request. If thats what you want, use 'catchall'.
> >> If you only want to send LCFs for requests that match your endpoints,
> >> use the 'internal' policy.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Jan
> >>
> >> Maulik wrote:
> >> > Hi Jan
> >> >   Thx for the response - just to clarify you meant to send an LCF for s
> >> non registered endpt, not avoid an LCF - correct?
> >> >
> >> > Thx
> >> > Maulik
> >> >
> >> > Sent from my iPhone
> >> >
> >> > On Mar 30, 2012, at 12:42 AM, Jan Willamowius <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Maulik,
> >> > >
> >> > > as you said, the latest release of GnuGk is 3.0.1. Version 3.1 is
> >> still
> >> > > in development and you can't get a packaged version, yet. You can get
> >> > > the source code from the CVS and compile it yourself, but please
> >> > > remember its not a release version, yet.
> >> > >
> >> > > The 'catchall' policy is available since GnuGk 2.3.1, but to avoid
> >> > > sending an LCF for a non existing endpoint, you might want to use the
> >> > > 'internal' policy instead. If your gateway doesn't register, configure
> >> > > it as a "permanent endpoint". See the manual for details.
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Jan
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Jan Willamowius, Founder of the GNU Gatekeeper Project
> >> > > EMail  : jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > > Website: http://www.gnugk.org
> >> > > Support: http://www.willamowius.com/gnugk-support.html
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Maulik Shah wrote:
> >> > >> Hi All
> >> > >>  Am a newbie to GnuGK and have looked through the aliases and a
> >> little
> >> > >> lost on a couple of items:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> 1. The Manuals on gnugk show they are for version 3.1 but the latest
> >> stable
> >> > >> version is 3.0.1 for Linux (Ubuntu apt-get is at 2.3.x) - how can I
> >> get a
> >> > >> Linux 64 bit tar for version 3.1?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> 2. Our basic use case for GnuGK is to act as a very simple dir GK:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Receive LRQ from anonymous video GKs (such as Tandberg VCS) for our
> >> domain
> >> > >> (say user@xxxxxxxxx) and sent back an LCF with the host@GWIP port
> >> 1720. I
> >> > >> was going to use the CatchAll routing policy but when i add that to
> >> the
> >> > >> gatekeeper.ini config, I get an error saying the policy is unknown. I
> >> > >> cannot have our GW register as it does not support RAS, is there any
> >> way to
> >> > >> configure this on the GnuGK without CatchAll?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Appreciate the help in advance
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Thanks
> >> > >> Maulik
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> This SF email is sponsosred by:
> >> Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
> >> _______________________________________________________
> >>
> >> Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Archive:
> >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
> >> Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
> >> Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
> >>
> >
> >


-- 
Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/


[SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Singles Community]     [Yosemite News]

Add to Google Powered by Linux