[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Using GNUGK for LRQ responses only



Hi,

no, I meant when you use the 'catchall' policy, GnuGk will send a LCF
for all LRQs, even if there is no endpoint that exactly matches the
request. If thats what you want, use 'catchall'.
If you only want to send LCFs for requests that match your endpoints,
use the 'internal' policy.

Regards,
Jan

Maulik wrote:
> Hi Jan 
>   Thx for the response - just to clarify you meant to send an LCF for s non registered endpt, not avoid an LCF - correct?
> 
> Thx
> Maulik
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Mar 30, 2012, at 12:42 AM, Jan Willamowius <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Maulik,
> > 
> > as you said, the latest release of GnuGk is 3.0.1. Version 3.1 is still
> > in development and you can't get a packaged version, yet. You can get
> > the source code from the CVS and compile it yourself, but please
> > remember its not a release version, yet.
> > 
> > The 'catchall' policy is available since GnuGk 2.3.1, but to avoid
> > sending an LCF for a non existing endpoint, you might want to use the
> > 'internal' policy instead. If your gateway doesn't register, configure
> > it as a "permanent endpoint". See the manual for details.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Jan
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jan Willamowius, Founder of the GNU Gatekeeper Project
> > EMail  : jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Website: http://www.gnugk.org
> > Support: http://www.willamowius.com/gnugk-support.html
> > 
> > 
> > Maulik Shah wrote:
> >> Hi All
> >>  Am a newbie to GnuGK and have looked through the aliases and a little
> >> lost on a couple of items:
> >> 
> >> 1. The Manuals on gnugk show they are for version 3.1 but the latest stable
> >> version is 3.0.1 for Linux (Ubuntu apt-get is at 2.3.x) - how can I get a
> >> Linux 64 bit tar for version 3.1?
> >> 
> >> 2. Our basic use case for GnuGK is to act as a very simple dir GK:
> >> 
> >> Receive LRQ from anonymous video GKs (such as Tandberg VCS) for our domain
> >> (say user@xxxxxxxxx) and sent back an LCF with the host@GWIP port 1720. I
> >> was going to use the CatchAll routing policy but when i add that to the
> >> gatekeeper.ini config, I get an error saying the policy is unknown. I
> >> cannot have our GW register as it does not support RAS, is there any way to
> >> configure this on the GnuGK without CatchAll?
> >> 
> >> Appreciate the help in advance
> >> 
> >> Thanks
> >> Maulik
> > 
> 


-- 
Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/


[SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Singles Community]     [Yosemite News]

Add to Google Powered by Linux