| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
hello Morgon,
On Wednesday 31 May 2006 18:55, Morgon Kanter wrote:
> It's me again. Still working on implementing more block ciphers, but
> there's an interesting issue in the preferred coding style. While the
> 3-space spaces-only indent is carried throughout, I've noticed two
> different styles for method openers throughout the code.
>
> The first:
> void
> something(arguments here) {
>
> The second:
> void something(arguments here) {
>
> Which one of these is the preferred?
neither :-) in case you missed the announcement, you can read about the
merge of GNU Crypto with GNU Classpath here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-crypto-discuss/2006-01/msg00004.html
the GNU Classpath home page is at:
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/
and its coding style, which we all try to follow, is described here:
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/docs/hacking.html#SEC7
the classes are the same but had their packages renamed to better fit
the GNU Classpath requirements. you should find CVS checkout
instructions on the GNU Classpath home page.
> I noticed in the README
> something about style guidelines but the links given 404, probably
> due to the move from the classpathx project to our own project. The
> home page in the README is also wrong, it still points to the
> classpathx page.
>
> All files referenced are from the latest CVS.
>
> -- Morgon
cheers;
rsn
Attachment:
pgpANmdiEOSlF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnu-crypto-discuss mailing list gnu-crypto-discuss@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-crypto-discuss
[Home] [Gnu Classpath] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Cryptography] [Fedora] [Fedora Directory] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Red Hat 9] [Network Security Reading]
|
![]() |