| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
>>>>> "TAKIGUCHI" == TAKIGUCHI Naruhito <naruhito@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: TAKIGUCHI> Hi, Marshall. >> I think you are correct, and that indeed using a '<=' is correct >> here. >> >> Have you tried GNU Crypto's version with that change? Does it work >> then? TAKIGUCHI> I have changed version 2.0.1's source, and it works TAKIGUCHI> successfully. ( Trailing some bytes of the dbMask are not TAKIGUCHI> 0x00.) Ok, I'll check a fix into the stable branch sometime soon. >> Also, if you have a test case for this (say, an example signature) I >> would like to add it to the test suite. TAKIGUCHI> Sorry, I have no test case yet. TAKIGUCHI> What do you need a set for test caese? private TAKIGUCHI> key(privateExponent, modulus, publicExponent), message and TAKIGUCHI> signature? Yeah, a private key, message, and known-good signature would be fine, and the test case would just generate the signature and check it against the good signature. -- Casey Marshall || csm@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ gnu-crypto-discuss mailing list gnu-crypto-discuss@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-crypto-discuss
[Home] [Gnu Classpath] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Cryptography] [Fedora] [Fedora Directory] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Red Hat 9] [Network Security Reading]
|