| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Hi, Marshall. > I think you are correct, and that indeed using a '<=' is correct > here. > > Have you tried GNU Crypto's version with that change? Does it work > then? I have changed version 2.0.1's source, and it works successfully. ( Trailing some bytes of the dbMask are not 0x00.) > Also, if you have a test case for this (say, an example signature) I > would like to add it to the test suite. Sorry, I have no test case yet. What do you need a set for test caese? private key(privateExponent, modulus, publicExponent), message and signature? Thanks in advance. --- NARUHITO mailto:naruhito@xxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ gnu-crypto-discuss mailing list gnu-crypto-discuss@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-crypto-discuss
[Home] [Gnu Classpath] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Cryptography] [Fedora] [Fedora Directory] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Red Hat 9] [Network Security Reading]
![]() |