| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
>>>>> "TAKIGUCHI" == TAKIGUCHI Naruhito <naruhito@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: TAKIGUCHI> Dear Gnu Crypto developers. TAKIGUCHI> I'm implementing the RSASSA-PSS signature in Java, and TAKIGUCHI> testing with Gnu Crypto. But the signature by my TAKIGUCHI> implementation does not verify by GNU Crypto. TAKIGUCHI> I have read PKCS#1 v2.1 again, and review GNU Crypto' TAKIGUCHI> EMSA_PSS.java. I doubt this is a bug in GNU Crypto's TAKIGUCHI> EM_PSS.java. TAKIGUCHI> PKCS#1 v2.1 B.2.1 MGF1 TAKIGUCHI> "3. For counter from 0 to [maskLen / hLen] - 1, do the following" TAKIGUCHI> In contract, EMSA_PSS.MGF method (line: 379), TAKIGUCHI> "for( int i = 0; i < limit; i++ )" . TAKIGUCHI> ^^^^^^^^^ TAKIGUCHI> In correctly, "for ( int i = 0; i <= limit; i++ )" ? TAKIGUCHI> ^^^^^^^^^^ TAKIGUCHI> Thanks in advance. I think you are correct, and that indeed using a '<=' is correct here. Have you tried GNU Crypto's version with that change? Does it work then? Also, if you have a test case for this (say, an example signature) I would like to add it to the test suite. Cheers, -- Casey Marshall || csm@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ gnu-crypto-discuss mailing list gnu-crypto-discuss@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-crypto-discuss
[Home] [Gnu Classpath] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Cryptography] [Fedora] [Fedora Directory] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Red Hat 9] [Network Security Reading]
|