Re: Building the VM classes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Building the VM classes
From: Christian Thalinger <twisti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:24:28 +0200
Cc: classpath@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <17c6771e0805130145i787fc120sa8229af1853e473a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <17c6771e0805101608q7b0042a3m4b2853dd40086c65@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1210667020.12017.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <17c6771e0805130145i787fc120sa8229af1853e473a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 09:45 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> That was my understanding.  Apart from making the code messier,
> it doesn't do any harm, it's just difficult to maintain if we don't
> build it with
> the 1.4 options.

OK, I think it's a good idea.

- twisti

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Building the VM classes
  - From: Dalibor Topic

References:
- Building the VM classes
  - From: Andrew John Hughes
- Re: Building the VM classes
  - From: Christian Thalinger
- Re: Building the VM classes
  - From: Andrew John Hughes

Prev by Date: Re: System.out.printf
Next by Date: Re: Integer.parseInt("+42") gives -42
Previous by thread: Re: Building the VM classes
Next by thread: Re: Building the VM classes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Home] [Linux Kernel List] [Linux Cryptography] [Fedora] [Fedora Directory] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Red Hat 9 Mailing List] [Network Security Reading]

Powered by Linux