Re: Classpath 0.95 build issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Classpath 0.95 build issue
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 11:37:05 -0700
Cc: _DISCUSS Classpath <classpath@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <463E1E90.20208@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <dt8sg4-ufc.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <q0g1h4-an.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <463E1E90.20208@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Tom Tromey <tromey@xxxxxxxxxx>

>>>>> "Audrius" == Audrius Meskauskas <audriusa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Audrius> This is becoming the permanent topic already. Maybe we could add 
Audrius> something to README or hackers guide?

Sounds good to me.  Dâniel, would you mind making a patch for this?
Perhaps a change to the FAQ is the best bet.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Classpath 0.95 build issue
  - From: Dâniel Fraga

References:
- Classpath 0.95 build issue
  - From: Dâniel Fraga
- Re: Classpath 0.95 build issue
  - From: Dâniel Fraga
- Re: Classpath 0.95 build issue
  - From: Audrius Meskauskas

Prev by Date: Re: Classpath 0.95 build issue
Next by Date: Re: gcjwebplugin usefullness? 64 bit plugin?
Previous by thread: Re: Classpath 0.95 build issue
Next by thread: Re: Classpath 0.95 build issue
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Home] [Linux Kernel List] [Linux Cryptography] [Fedora] [Fedora Directory] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Red Hat 9 Mailing List] [Network Security Reading]

Powered by Linux