Re: About -X<option> | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > Isn't that obvious? -X looks like a short option, but the rest of that > string does not consist of aggregated short options. Ah, I see. Then the issue is not about "not easy to code" but about "not being consistent". We should care much more deeply about the latter. We can change it to "--X<option>[=<value>]" and "-X option[=<value>]"; the topic is still young, not even documented properly IIRC, and is not scheduled for 'master' any time soon yet. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Newbies FAQ] [Kernel List] [Site Home] [Free Online Dating] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Free Online Dating] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [DDR & Rambus] [Linux Resources]