Re: Why do git submodules require manual checkouts and commits? | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Hi, On Fri, 16 May 2008, Avery Pennarun wrote: > So I think it would be very bad if the supermodule automatically > updated to the latest version of the submodule whenever you commit in > the submodule. *However*, the other way around might be fine: if you > commit in the supermodule, maybe it should commit in the submodule at > the same time and link to that specific commit. I'm pretty sure that > idea doesn't have any *fundamental* flaws, it's just got a lot of > really tricky details that need to be worked out. Just the fundamental flaw that you might _not_ want to commit that, just as you can have a dirty Makefile _forever_. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Newbies FAQ] [Kernel List] [Site Home] [Free Online Dating] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Free Online Dating] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [DDR & Rambus] [Linux Resources]