Re: [PATCH] Support non-WIN32 system lacking poll() while keeping the WIN32 part intact

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

"Joachim Schmitz" <jojo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Do you really need to have both?  I suspect "If you do not have a usable
>> sys/poll.h, set NO_SYS_POLL_H" may be a simpler alternative, but there
> must
> Hmm, Not having <sys/poll.h> and not having poll() are different thinks,
> aren't they?

Ahh, OK, I forgot the other combination: working poll() but inclusion
of sys/poll.h is unnecessary.  OK.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Free Online Dating]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Free Online Dating]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux Resources]

Add to Google