|
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/4] jk/version-string and google code | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
|
Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> Yes, I think that is all that is necessary to fix the immediate issue.
> The protocol-capabilities document talks about what to do when
> include-tag is not available ("SHOULD issue a subsequent fetch to
> acquire the tags that include-tag would have otherwise given the
> client"), but I am not sure how well we handle that (in theory we should
> be handling it already, but I didn't look).
Yeah, it is more like "A separate fetch only to follow tags was the
only way we handled it before we added include-tag, so we know it
used to work, and also we know the four combinations of new/old *
fetch/upload all used to work".
We may have broken some combinations over time, though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Newbies FAQ] [Linux Kernel Development] [Free Online Dating] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Free Online Dating] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users] [Linux Resources]