|
|
|
Re: [PATCH] tests: Introduce test_seq | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
|
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 01:53:15PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Wouldn't it be cleaner and readable to write it like this > > "$PERL_PATH" -le 'print for $ARGV[0]..$ARGV[1]' "$1" "$2" > > by the way? Yeah, that would be more robust (it's longer to type, which is why I avoided it in the inline replacement, but since we're factoring it out, that's not an issue). -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Newbies FAQ] [Linux Kernel Development] [Free Online Dating] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Free Online Dating] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users] [Linux Resources]