Re: [PATCH] branch: make --set-upstream saner without an explicit starting point

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 00:29 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Yep, this seems good. Now that you mention the <name> existing, I wonder
> > if letting --set-upstream create the branch as well wasn't another bad
> > decision, as the name suggests it's for setting that information after
> > the branch has already been created.
> You should be able to correct that for --set-upstream-to=<upstream>.
> It is clearly about setting upstream for an existing branch, right?

Yeah, it's for changing the tracking information and should refuse to do
so if the branch doesn't exist yet.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Free Online Dating]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Free Online Dating]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux Resources]

Add to Google