Re: [PATCH] branch: make --set-upstream saner without an explicit starting point

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>]

Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Yep, this seems good. Now that you mention the <name> existing, I wonder
> if letting --set-upstream create the branch as well wasn't another bad
> decision, as the name suggests it's for setting that information after
> the branch has already been created.

You should be able to correct that for --set-upstream-to=<upstream>.
It is clearly about setting upstream for an existing branch, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html