On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 07:56:23AM +0100, Chris Webb wrote: > > This, and "://", both sound sensible. > > I have no real preference between any of the suggestions so far: they'd all > be completely fine with me. Peff's :// test for a URL is much better than my > http: prefix, so should replace the latter if we need a test at all, but > apart from that I don't mind at all. > > Okay, I'll re-send now the :// version I did in response to Peff's first > email purely on the basis that it doesn't change the behaviour at all for > existing users who don't set htmlpath at all, plus it's already sat in my > reflog! I think the "://" one is my preference. I just looked over your v3 series, and the patches look good to me. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Newbies FAQ] [Linux Kernel Development] [Free Online Dating] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Free Online Dating] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users] [Linux Resources]