Re: [PATCH] rebase -i -p: use rerere to resolve conflicts if enabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Am 17.06.2012 15:46, schrieb David Kilzer:
> If it could be guaranteed that all changes in a merge commit would be
> preserved when running "git rebase -i -p" with rerere.autoupdate
> enabled, I think that would be an argument for not returning control
> to the user during the rebase operation.  However, changes to
> non-conflicted files in a merge commit are currently lost in this
> case, so it would be too dangerous to enable this behavior now.

You can test this patch:

  git://repo.or.cz/git/mingw/j6t.git preserve-merges-by-cherry-pick

I think it suits you needs unless you run into the one use-case where
the patch is a regression (as documented by the new test_expect_failure
in the test suite).

-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Free Online Dating]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Free Online Dating]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux Resources]

Add to Google