Felipe Contreras wrote: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/195685 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/195689 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/195691 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.bash.completion.devel/3877 > > You could have skipped this I'm also really confused about this. Are you saying that trying to figure out the bash-completion conventions was a waste of time? It even resulted in a patch to bash-completion being applied that improved consistency, which I thought was an attribute you valued. Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Newbies FAQ] [Linux Kernel Development] [Free Online Dating] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Free Online Dating] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users] [Linux Resources]