|
|
|
Re: [PATCH] diff: avoid stack-buffer-read-overrun for very long name | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
|
On 04/26/2012 06:13 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jim Meyering<jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> What do you think about replacing those two append-if-needed two-liners: >> >> if (buffer2.len&& buffer2.buf[buffer2.len - 1] != '/') >> strbuf_addch(&buffer2, '/'); >> >> by something that readably encapsulates the idiom: >> >> strbuf_append_if_absent (&buffer2, '/'); >> >> (though the name isn't particularly apt, because you might >> take "absent" to mean "not anywhere in the string," so maybe >> strbuf_append_if_not_already_at_end (ugly) or >> strbuf_append_uniq >> ) > > I am not good at names, but strbuf_terminate_with(&buffer2, '/') > perhaps? > "terminate" sounds pretty final though. How about strbuf_ensure_suffixch()? It embeds the 'ch', marking it as a char argument and provides natural names for strbuf_ensure_suffix(buf, char *str); strbuf_ensure_prefix(buf, char *str); strbuf_ensure_prefixch(buf, char c); if those are ever needed. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war on peace. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Newbies FAQ] [Linux Kernel Development] [Free Online Dating] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Free Online Dating] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users] [Linux Resources]