Re: [PATCH 1/3] git-svn: use POSIX::sigprocmask to block signals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Roman Kagan <rkagan@xxxxxxx> writes:

> [B]locking some signals is obviously not a good enough
> protection measure: the program may die on SIGKILL or the power may go
> off.

Ahh, that is what you meant.  I agree that it is of dubious value to
only try to catch signals, even though it may be better than nothing.

It should be sufficient to replace the "[...]" part with the above,
and conclude it with "But it will be a separate topic that this patch
does not address." or something.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Free Online Dating]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Free Online Dating]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux Resources]

Add to Google