|
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2] completion: add new git_complete helper | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
|
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>> Even more, I just added a foobar() function in my profile, and I also
>> added a foobar() function in /etc/bash_completion.d/git. I don't see
>> my function replaced in any way, even after typing and completing
>> 'git' commands. I don't know how that's possible, but that's why I
>> don't like to take these types of claims as face value.
>
> What version of the bash_completion library do you use? Lazy-loading
> was introduced in version 1.90.
1.99
> If you put
>
> foobar() {
> echo hi
> }
> . /etc/bash_completion
>
> then is your private foobar unclobbered?
Yes, in that case it does, but that's not the default behavior, at
least not in my system, and I doubt anybody would define their
functions before loading library scripts.
> To answer your demand before for a function in the public interface of
> a completion script, not library, which respects or does not respect
> the bash-completion convention: see the public _rpm_installed_packages
> helper from the rpm completion script[1].
What makes you think this is public? It's under the section '# helper
functions', which doesn't seem to be public. Plus, it's repeated in
rpm, rpmbuild, and rpmbuild-md5.
The fact that somebody uses it doesn't mean it's public.
Cheers.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Newbies FAQ] [Linux Kernel Development] [Free Online Dating] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Free Online Dating] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users] [Linux Resources]