Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Even more, I just added a foobar() function in my profile, and I also
> added a foobar() function in /etc/bash_completion.d/git. I don't see
> my function replaced in any way, even after typing and completing
> 'git' commands. I don't know how that's possible, but that's why I
> don't like to take these types of claims as face value.
What version of the bash_completion library do you use? Lazy-loading
was introduced in version 1.90.
If you put
foobar() {
echo hi
}
. /etc/bash_completion
then is your private foobar unclobbered?
To answer your demand before for a function in the public interface of
a completion script, not library, which respects or does not respect
the bash-completion convention: see the public _rpm_installed_packages
helper from the rpm completion script[1].
If you don't like the convention or think that I have misunderstood
it, I can understand that and would recommend that you suggest a
different one and get it adopted and documented by the bash_completion
project.
Jonathan
[1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/bash-completion-devel/2012-March/004359.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Newbies FAQ] [Linux Kernel Development] [Free Online Dating] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Free Online Dating] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users] [Linux Resources]