On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I wonder if use of remoteheads later in the same function are correct,
> though. We equate "!remoteheads->next" and "We are not doing octopus",
> for example.
I do think it would generally be a great idea to never use
"remoteheads" at all. An octopus merge that has been simplified to
just two parents isn't really an octopus merge any more.
So I think you're probably right - we should try to avoid using
remoteheads entirely, and any use is suspect
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Newbies FAQ] [Linux Kernel Development] [Free Online Dating] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Free Online Dating] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users] [Linux Resources]