Re: Why can't git open empty branches ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Hi Hadmut ;-)

On 11.04.2012 13:47, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
Creating independent branches by pushing two separates into a single
remote bare is a nice idea, but if I understood git correctly, the very
first commit in a repos is always to the master branch, where you have

AFAIK the only thing that makes master the initial branch is the file .git/HEAD that points to master after you "git init". This is not hardcoded.

> So your proposal might work perfectly, but in my eyes it is error
> prone and not user friendly.

Serious errors should not happen since the bare repo on the server is created with the flag denyNonFastForwards. So even if you had a master branch in both repos, only one of them, the first one, would succeed in pushing to the server, a push of the second one would give you an error message. Maybe not user friendly, but safe.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Free Online Dating]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Free Online Dating]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux Resources]

Add to Google