| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Saturday, May 12, 2012, 14:20:02, Guillermo Espertino (Gez) wrote:
> btw, new jpeg defaults are much, much better than 2.6s but imo the
> progressive option shouldn't be on. It makes the file size a tad larger
> and it isn't always needed. Is there any special reason for using that
> option as default?
In my experience, the majority of images become smaller when you save
them as progressive.
--
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ >
A computer makes as many mistakes in two seconds as 20 men working 20 years.
-- Horowitz's Rule
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
[Home] [Video For Linux] [Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Yosemite Book Store] [gtk] [GIMP for Windows] [KDE] [Scanner] [Memory] [GEGL] [Gimp's Home] [Gimp on Windows] [Steve's Art] [Webcams]
![]() |