Partha Bagchi <partha1b@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >Can you provide an example image to confirm this? Sure. Let's use the clouds photo since it is a more modern Sony format and pretty dramatically shows the loss of information. Point your browser here: http://smallthoughts.com/photos/misc/GIMP/clouds.arw and save the image. This is a 24-Mb image file taken with an Alpha a77 camera. Thanks for looking at this. Let me know if I can provide any additional info. Regards, -- Jeff >On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Jeffery Small <jeff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Alexander Rabtchevich <alexander.v.rabtchevich@xxxxxxx> writes: >> >> >When you look at an imported image in darktable without applying any >> >corrections, the program shows you the embedded preview, which was made >> >by the camera itself with all the corrections it (the camera) would made >> >with the original RAW when converting it to jpg. If you applyin UFRaw a >> >camera curve, similar to the one in darktable, you will see the similar >> >result... >> >> It's true that the lion image imported into UFRaw is terribly over exposed, >> but that is something that UFRaw is doing to the raw data. The original >> image has proper exposure which was confirmed at the time the picture was >> shot as well as the proper exposure from the companion JPEG image (I shoot >> RAW+JPG). In UFRaw the histogram is shoved completely to the right edge >> of the spectrum and there is no way to use this tool to fix the picture as >> most of the image detail is already lost. When I open the same file in the >> DiMAGE Image Viewer software from Minolta (on a Windows XP machine), the >> raw image looks just fine and can be tweaked. >> >> So I have to assume that this is a serious bug in UFRaw and I have reported >> it as such. I'm just confused that I have not heard other people >> complaining >> about this problem. >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Jeff >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gimp-user-list mailing list >> List address: gimp-user-list@xxxxxxxxx >> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list >> List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list >> >--001a11c2ef8064e2f704f65119ee >Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ><div dir=3D"ltr">Can you provide an example image to confirm this?<div><br>= ></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Partha</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><= >br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Jeffery S= >mall <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:jeff@xxxxxxxx" target=3D"_blan= >k">jeff@xxxxxxxx</a>></span> wrote:<br> ><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p= >x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Alexander Rabtchevich <<a href=3D"mailto:= >alexander.v.rabtchevich@xxxxxxx">alexander.v.rabtchevich@xxxxxxx</a>> wr= >ites:<br> ><br> >>When you look at an imported image in darktable without applying any<br= >> >>corrections, the program shows you the embedded preview, which was made= ><br> >>by the camera itself with all the corrections it (the camera) would mad= >e<br> >>with the original RAW when converting it to jpg. If you applyin UFRaw a= ><br> >>camera curve, similar to the one in darktable, you will see the similar= ><br> >>result...<br> ><br> >It's true that the lion image imported into UFRaw is terribly over expo= >sed,<br> >but that is something that UFRaw is doing to the raw data. =A0The original<= >br> >image has proper exposure which was confirmed at the time the picture was<b= >r> >shot as well as the proper exposure from the companion JPEG image (I shoot<= >br> >RAW+JPG). =A0In UFRaw the histogram is shoved completely to the right edge<= >br> >of the spectrum and there is no way to use this tool to fix the picture as<= >br> >most of the image detail is already lost. =A0When I open the same file in t= >he<br> >DiMAGE Image Viewer software from Minolta (on a Windows XP machine), the<br= >> >raw image looks just fine and can be tweaked.<br> ><br> >So I have to assume that this is a serious bug in UFRaw and I have reported= ><br> >it as such. =A0I'm just confused that I have not heard other people com= >plaining<br> >about this problem.<br> ><br> >Regards,<br> >--<br> >Jeff<br> ><br> >_______________________________________________<br> >gimp-user-list mailing list<br> >List address: =A0 =A0<a href=3D"mailto:gimp-user-list@xxxxxxxxx">gimp-user-= >list@xxxxxxxxx</a><br> >List membership: <a href=3D"https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-us= >er-list" target=3D"_blank">https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-use= >r-list</a><br> >List archives: =A0 <a href=3D"https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-lis= >t" target=3D"_blank">https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list</a><br> ></blockquote></div><br></div> >--001a11c2ef8064e2f704f65119ee-- _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: gimp-user-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list