akovia (akovia1@xxxxxx) wrote: > The main problem is when trying to stroke a hand made path. If either > handle is even the slightest bit pulled out, it will interrupt the > stroke and leave a gap. This is a problem for 2 reasons. I don't understand what you mean by "gap"? Are you saying that having a corner at a node makes edit->stroke path leave gaps? Can you create a screenshot? > 1. When placing nodes, the new tool is too sensitive and I think it > could use some sort of threshold adjustment. Unless you concentrate to > make sure the mouse is completely still when placing the node, click > the mouse and fully release the button before the slightest movement, > it will inevitably pull the handles out the tiniest bit. This can be > very hard to see if you aren't zoomed in extremely close, and really > destroys your workflow. yeah, that might make sense - my first attempt would put the threshold at the radius of the node representation. > 2. My path workflow has always been to just drag the path itself out > away from the node to draw out the handles. This again now will affect > the handle on the opposing node and push out the handle the slightest > bit and mess up the stroke. Note that if you drag the path closely to one node, the handle on the opposite node will not be moved. Only a (largeish) area in the middle moves both handles simultaneously (yet still with a shifting weight depending on where you drag). > I believe the old path tool probably reacted in nearly the same way, > but the stroke was never left with these gaps. Again - I have no idea what gaps you are referring to. Maybe a screenshot can help. Bye, Simon -- simon@xxxxxxxx http://simon.budig.de/ _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: gimp-user-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list