On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Rob Antonishen wrote: > And this is where your use case is wrong! The whole point of separating save > and export is that ONLY save is "safe". An export is NOT guaranteed to be > either safe or lossless. It may be, depending on the source image. Your > example exactly demonstrates the purpose of the new paradigm. The main problem I see with the suggested use case is here: "Transparancy lost. This is something I already encountered once, so it is a realistic use case." Excuse me, Anoko, but there's no way I'm going to believe that a mistake that is only ever done once is going to completely ruin everything. Especially since GIMP asks to save project data. Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp Announce] [Gimp Images] [GIMP Development] [Video For Linux] [Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [gtk] [KDE] [Scanner] [Gimp's Home] [Gimp Docs] [Gimp on Windows] [Steve's Art] [Webcams] [Share Your Images] [Free Online Dating] [Photo Site] [Script Fu] [GIMP Software] [GIMP Books]
 |
 |