I did the same, and also have 2 friends, frequent users of gimp that went back to 2.6. Though it's somewhat more unstable than 2.8, 2.6 is much more efficient, comfortable, intuitive, fast, and convenient. >From my own part, what decided me to get back to 2.6 is the lame impossibility to choose page format: portrait or landscape. One day, gimp will choose it's better for my life and for the planet and for the universe to edit only red bitmaps. This day, i'll still be on the 2.6 ;-P then i dun care. GL for your future lame choices developpers ! -- pitibonom (via gimpusers.com) _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp Announce] [Gimp Images] [GIMP Development] [Video For Linux] [Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [gtk] [KDE] [Scanner] [Gimp's Home] [Gimp Docs] [Gimp on Windows] [Steve's Art] [Webcams] [Share Your Images] [Free Online Dating] [Photo Site] [Script Fu] [GIMP Software] [GIMP Books]
 |
 |