Re: Benchmarking Gimp/GEGL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Jernej Simončič
<jernej|s-gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 03:31:26 +0200, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
>> It also turns out that babl and GEGL on win32 seem to be compiled
>> practically without optimization and without taking modern instruction
>> sets into account, making any testing of them on windows
>> unrepresentative of their actual performance.
>
> What are the recommended optimization flags?

On win32, no idea, perhaps look at what compiler flags are being used
on linux? This is signal processing code and everything from
-ffast-math to -ftree-vectorize and probably more are important.

/Ø
-- 
«The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed»
                                                 -- William Gibson
http://pippin.gimp.org/ ;                           http://ffii.org/
_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@xxxxxxxxx
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list



[Gimp Announce]     [Gimp Images]     [GIMP Development]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [gtk]     [KDE]     [Scanner]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp Docs]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]     [Webcams]     [Share Your Images]     [Free Online Dating]     [Photo Site]     [Script Fu]     [GIMP Software]     [GIMP Books]

Barnes&Noble.com

Add to Google Follow Gimp on Twitter