On 2009-10-02, Norman Silverstone <norman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have been following this thread with interest so I decided to do some > tests. The results may be relevant or not as the case may be but I think > that they are interesting. My little camera gives a RAW image = 8.6 MB > and a jpeg image = 2.6 MB. The developed RAW image from UFRaw saved at > 98% jpeg = 17.2 MB What do you think are benefits of using jpegs with quality above 95%? Better use compressed 8-bit sRGB TIFF instead (all minilabs I know would reject TIFF with *any* compression, though...). Ilya _______________________________________________ Gimp-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp Announce] [Gimp Images] [GIMP Development] [Video For Linux] [Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [gtk] [KDE] [Scanner] [Gimp's Home] [Gimp Docs] [Gimp on Windows] [Steve's Art] [Webcams] [Share Your Images] [Free Online Dating] [Photo Site] [Script Fu] [GIMP Software] [GIMP Books]
 |
 |