--- gimp_user <david@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
> transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool that is
> ready for adoption by high quality image makers.
I would disagree with this. I use both PS and GIMP and thanks to PH I
had no problems learning GIMP's UI. Of course, your millage will vary.
In fact, there are more similarities than differences:
o Each has a palette of editing tools on one side of the screen
o Each has additional tool palettes on the other side (e.g., layers)
o And each has a main image window
The UI differences, IMO, are minor:
o Distinct windows for palettes and image window
o Options moved from top of window to below editing tools
o Image window enhanced with its own menu bar.
Even most of the icons are similar to Photoshop. Unless your brand new
to Photoshop, I don't see the problem.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting
_______________________________________________
Gimp-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp Announce] [Gimp Images] [GIMP Development] [Video For Linux] [Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [gtk] [KDE] [Scanner] [Gimp's Home] [Gimp Docs] [Gimp on Windows] [Steve's Art] [Webcams] [Share Your Images] [Free Online Dating] [Photo Site] [Script Fu] [GIMP Software] [GIMP Books]
![]() |
![]() |