> I do not know the history of how gimpshop developers and gimp developers fell > out with one another. Frankly I amd most users do not care about how that > happened but I am more concerned about how the future. I would like to see a > viable photoshop emulating gui for gimp and 16+bit per channel, decent raw > file handling and a far more easily customisable working environment that > builds on industry wide knowledge. David, It seems to me that with your needs and wants and attitude, you are better off just buying and using Photoshop. You must remember that with FOSS like the GIMP, sometimes you need to invest your own time into making it work in your workflow... like finding another package to handle your RAW files, and then importing them into the GIMP. If you absolutely need and demand all the these things now, then just go with the commercial product, and don't worry about the GIMP. Regards, Mike _______________________________________________ Gimp-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp Announce] [Gimp Images] [GIMP Development] [Video For Linux] [Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [gtk] [KDE] [Scanner] [Gimp's Home] [Gimp Docs] [Gimp on Windows] [Steve's Art] [Webcams] [Share Your Images] [Free Online Dating] [Photo Site] [Script Fu] [GIMP Software] [GIMP Books]
 |
 |