Re: xml2po - standard or patched version?

[Kolbjørn Stuestøl <kolbjoern@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

RyōTa SimaMoto skreiv:
> 2010/1/3 Ulf-D. Ehlert <ude88@xxxxxx>:
> ..
>   
> > So we definitely have to decide which program to use! Soon!
> >     
>
> Hi,
>
> I welcome the new customized version.
>
> I tried to set page title just like as its menu term, and append
> trailing dots "..." after the page title if the term has dots, i.e the
> command calls a dialog.  But with the standard XML2PO,
> <placeholder> tags sometimes apply this style on dialog
> titles (or indexterm) too :(  If <placeholder> replaces only few
> words, it is not necessary.  When this tag substitutes some
> sentences, a paragraph, an image, or a block, it is useful
> because it gives flexibility on translation works.
>   
Ulf's version of xml2po works very fine. So I vote for it.
I dislike the <placeholders>, except perhaps as replacement for a common 
image or so, as they narrow my freedom in translation.
The 3 dots (...):
I am used to use a special character called "ellipse" (⋯ or *…*) in 
those situations mentioned above (when a menu calls a dialog). I do not 
know whether this char is typographical standard (recommendation) in 
other languages.

Kolbjoern

begin:vcard
fn;quoted-printable:Kolbj=C3=B8rn Stuest=C3=B8l
n;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:Stuest=C3=B8l;Kolbj=C3=B8rn
email;internet:kolbjoern@xxxxxxxxxxxx
tel;home:38 34 78 62
tel;cell:917 81 125
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard

_______________________________________________
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs