[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: [ogfs-users]RE NFS Mount



I meant targets and yes I'm using LVM2. I'll give the user space nfs
server a try thanks.

On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 10:20, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 19:41, Hugo Samayoa wrote:
> >  > Just curious, if there"s only one (filesystem server) node, why do you
> > > need a clustered filesystem such as OpenGFS?
> > Later on when we add more storage I want to add another iSCSI target or HyperSCSI target to the mix. Then export everything via one filesystem 
> > 
> Did you mean initiators?
> 
> I may be confused, but I think iSCSI targets just act like disk drives,
> or FC LUNs.  OpenGFS is not really needed to manage adding in extra
> targets/drives/LUNs.
> 
> In fact, OpenGFS would require EVMS or Pool to manage all the multiple
> targets/drives/LUNs.
> 
> If your not using ogfs, you could also use LVM1 or LVM2.
> 
> If you do need to use ogfs, I would consider using the User Space
> implementation of the nfs server.
> 
> I would think that using the kernel space implementation is much more
> likely to have bugs.
> 
> HTH
> Greg



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Opengfs-users mailing list
Opengfs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opengfs-users

[Site Home]     [Kernel list]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [DVD Store]     [Linux Clusters]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux