| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 19:41, Hugo Samayoa wrote: > > Just curious, if there"s only one (filesystem server) node, why do you > > need a clustered filesystem such as OpenGFS? > Later on when we add more storage I want to add another iSCSI target or HyperSCSI target to the mix. Then export everything via one filesystem > Did you mean initiators? I may be confused, but I think iSCSI targets just act like disk drives, or FC LUNs. OpenGFS is not really needed to manage adding in extra targets/drives/LUNs. In fact, OpenGFS would require EVMS or Pool to manage all the multiple targets/drives/LUNs. If your not using ogfs, you could also use LVM1 or LVM2. If you do need to use ogfs, I would consider using the User Space implementation of the nfs server. I would think that using the kernel space implementation is much more likely to have bugs. HTH Greg -- Greg Freemyer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ Opengfs-users mailing list Opengfs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opengfs-users