| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
> Just curious, if there"s only one (filesystem server) node, why do you > need a clustered filesystem such as OpenGFS? Later on when we add more storage I want to add another iSCSI target or HyperSCSI target to the mix. Then export everything via one filesystem > You should not need to ... the cluster info is just for the > locking/journaling aspects of OpenGFS, which does not involve the client > nodes, if I understand your setup correctly. Yeah thats what I figured. It works when it a cluster but not with NFS which seems strange. > Any other opinions/insight out there? I am getting these error messages occasionally ... Jun 17 10:49:19 storage01 kernel: lockd: cannot monitor 10.2.1.202 The 10.2.1.202 address is one of the clients. I get this from the clients. [root@web01 storage]# touch stuff [root@web01 storage]# ls -la total 36 drwxrwxrwx 7 root root 3864 Jun 17 16:23 . drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 4096 Jun 12 11:02 .. drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 3864 Jun 12 12:53 pb drwxrwxrwx 3 root root 3864 Jun 17 15:19 shared -rw-rw-rw- 1 nfsnobody nfsnobody 0 Jun 17 16:40 stuff drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 3864 Jun 12 12:53 vb drwxrwxrwx 41 root root 3864 Jun 12 13:14 vb2 [root@web01 storage]# rm -f stuff rm: cannot remove `stuff': Operation not permitted [root@web01 storage]# -- Hugo Samayoa <hugo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND _______________________________________________ Opengfs-users mailing list Opengfs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opengfs-users