RE: [ogfs-dev]Recovery Race conditions
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stanley Wang [mailto:stanley.wang@linux.co.intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 3:54 AM
> To: OpenGFS-Dev
> Subject: Re: [ogfs-dev]Recovery Race conditions
>
> For 1.b). Current implementation uses also locking server as
> the cluster
> manager.
Just to be clear, the current implementation uses the memexp *lock module* (one in each node) as the (distributed?) cluster manager, with the help of the memexpd central lock *storage* server. All of the "brains" for cluster management are in the lock module ... memexpd simply stores the current state, to share among all nodes.
-- Ben --
Opinions are mine, not Intel's
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Opengfs-devel mailing list
Opengfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opengfs-devel
[Kernel]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Clusters]
[Linux RAID]
[Yosemite Hiking]
[Linux Resources]