| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:10:29PM +0800, Stanley Wang wrote: > Please see my comments. > > On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 23:16, Joe DiMartino wrote: > > I tend to agree with Brian, that there is lots of work to do > > before attempting a merge with the kernel tree, and resources > > are scarce. > It's ture. I agree. > And the real meaning of mine is reduce the complexity of the codes. > I think it could help us understand the codes easilier. It should be > very helpful for our current works. > > Last of all, if most of you agree to do the reorganizing work later, it > will be ok to me. The reorganizing is just a suggestion :) In any case, *thinking* about how the source tree should be organised might help structuring the code too. Care to write down a proposal? Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Opengfs-devel mailing list Opengfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opengfs-devel