| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Hi, folks I suggest to reorganize the whole source tree. We could combine the common codes and architecture dependent codes into one directory -- "ogfs", and place it in the vanilla linux kernel source tree. Of course we should own both 2.4 and 2.5 kernel tree, each of them contains the corresponding ogfs codes. And we should maintain the third source tree for all the utilities and docs. For the sake of maintain source tree more easily, I also suggest move from CVS to BK. We could create a project for OpenGFS @bkbits.net (http://www.bitkeeper.com/Hosted.Creating.html). I believe the reorganzing would benifit both the develop and maintain work. And it would also make the OpenGFS more easily to be adopted by the mainstream linux kernel. How do you think about these suggestions ? Thanks, Stan -- Opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent Intel Corporation ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Opengfs-devel mailing list Opengfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opengfs-devel