On 4/20/11, Paul Sbarra wrote:
> Regarding the licensing I think we should look at this from a larger
> perspective. I picked libraw from the todo list because it was there.
The list also mentions rawspeed :) I, sort of, put both there :)
> I don't think using libraw gives us any additional functionality over what
> could be done with dcraw.
Really? :) How about libraries currently being faster due to all sorts
of optimizations, like rawspeed being threaded and using SSE2?
> What's the longer-term strategy for supporting raw files? The Darktable
> project is _really_ good at developing raw images (non-destructively). It
> would be great if you could have that same functionality but also include
> the additional image processing capabilities that GIMP provides (blur,
> heal/clone, layers, etc).
I think houz did a nice description before:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=26372766
This is a view from dt project, but it makes a perfect sense.
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
_______________________________________________
Gegl-developer mailing list
Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
[Video For Linux]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[gtk]
[GIMP Users]
[KDE]
[Scanner]
[Gimp's Home]
[Gimp on Windows]
[Steve's Art]
[Webcams]