On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 07:36 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> > GIMP tends to claim C89 compatibility; we shouldnt assume more modern
> > language standard than GIMP does.
>
> Hi Ãyvind
>
> What problems do you expect us to get if we begin to rely on an 11 year
> old standard instead of a 21 year old standard?
>
> At what time has enough time passed for us to feel comfortable using the
> improvements in C99?
As soon as enough compilers support it so that we don't loose platform
compatibility.
What specific C99 features are we talking about at all? Is there a
specific feature that you guys would like to use?
Sven
_______________________________________________
Gegl-developer mailing list
Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
[Video For Linux]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[gtk]
[GIMP Users]
[KDE]
[Scanner]
[Gimp's Home]
[Gimp on Windows]
[Steve's Art]
[Webcams]