On 09/30/2010 01:02 AM, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Rupert Weber<gimp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> More questions...
>>
>> 1. C standard
>> The docs state "ANSI C" as a feature. Is that actually meant in the
>> strict sense of C89, not C99? Does that hold for (babl-)extensions as
>> well? I'm specifically thinking about inline and inttypes.h.
>
> GIMP tends to claim C89 compatibility; we shouldnt assume more modern
> language standard than GIMP does.
Hi Øyvind
What problems do you expect us to get if we begin to rely on an 11 year
old standard instead of a 21 year old standard?
At what time has enough time passed for us to feel comfortable using the
improvements in C99?
/ Martin
--
My GIMP Blog:
http://www.chromecode.com/
"Automatic tab style and removed tab title bar"
_______________________________________________
Gegl-developer mailing list
Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
[Video For Linux]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[gtk]
[GIMP Users]
[KDE]
[Scanner]
[Gimp's Home]
[Gimp on Windows]
[Steve's Art]
[Webcams]