On 09/15/2010 05:11 PM, Rupert Weber wrote:
> And now that double formats exist for all models, shouldn't we consider
> deprecating model-to-model conversions alltogether?
ok, scratch that. (I'll just keep talking to myself...)
I just found out the hard way what model-to-model conversions are about:
1. They can only be from/to RGBA (that part was easy)
2. For every new model, model-to-model conversions *must* be supplied.
Those are the reference conversions which babl assumes to have an error
of 0. Replacing those by the respective double format-to-format
conversions doesn't work.
I'll have to amend the guide accordingly.
What I haven't tried yet: What happens if two extensions supply
model-to-model conversions for the same format, but with different results?
Rupert
_______________________________________________
Gegl-developer mailing list
Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
[Video For Linux]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[gtk]
[GIMP Users]
[KDE]
[Scanner]
[Gimp's Home]
[Gimp on Windows]
[Steve's Art]
[Webcams]