Martin Nordholts wrote:
> Martin Nordholts wrote:
>> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> In my (biased) humble opinion, GNU M4 integrates the gnulib tree
>>> into it's git repository in a neat and easy to manage way.
>>>
>>
>> The M4 way [1] indeed looks very nice and maintainable, could you
>> provide a patch for that approach please?
>
> Oh, and we most likely want to wait with this until the GNOME
> migration to git, which will begin April 16, is complete.
Hi Gary
The git migration is now complete, how is your patch coming along?
As a starting point for Git for developers, refer to this site:
http://live.gnome.org/Git/Developer
BR,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Gegl-developer mailing list
Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
- References:
- Re: babl portability patches, and a test failure
- Re: babl portability patches, and a test failure
- Re: babl portability patches, and a test failure
- Re: babl portability patches, and a test failure
- Re: babl portability patches, and a test failure
- Re: babl portability patches, and a test failure
- Re: babl portability patches, and a test failure
- Re: babl portability patches, and a test failure
- Re: babl portability patches, and a test failure
- Re: babl portability patches, and a test failure
- Re: babl portability patches, and a test failure
- Re: babl portability patches, and a test failure
- Re: babl portability patches, and a test failure
[Video For Linux]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[gtk]
[GIMP Users]
[KDE]
[Scanner]
[Gimp's Home]
[Gimp on Windows]
[Steve's Art]
[Webcams]